Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Mailman, etc. upgrade woes and persistent bugs

by Jim Popovitch

On Sat, 2021-02-13 at 10:40 -0500, Brian Carpenter wrote: > On 2/13/21 10:37 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-users wrote: > > On Sat, 2021-02-13 at 08:01 -0500, Brian Carpenter wrote: > > > Features are not the only thing about a modern UI, UX design plays a > > > MAJOR role in the modern UI. Postorius should have at least matched MM2 > > > in features in regards to something as important as Member management > > > but instead it took a step back into the dark ages. > > I'm gonna be a dick and remind you that less than 1 year ago you were > > trying to convince me that MM3 was a gift from god and that it was time > > for me to jump from MM2 to MM3 because it was sooo easy and such a time > > saver.. or something like that. The point being, you yourself just > > still aren't happy with MM3. Welcome to the club. > > I am very happy with MM3 just not with Postorius. MM3 allowed me to come > up with my own admin interface. Mailman 2 would never allowed me to do > that. So please leave your Mailman 2 bondage and come over to Mailman 3. > We have cookies! But how do you display a "Membership List page" for admins in MM3 (choice of wording is specific to other emails you've posted today) without third-party application(s), and isn't that too a shortcoming in MM3 due to that functionality being present in MM2? Look, without a doubt the REST API of MM3 Core is cool, but let's be honest, all the 3rd party wrapping and baggage is, well, not so cool. But, again being honest, you can't have a MM3 system without all of those things. With MM2 we have all those things, and we are happy with them. :) -Jim P.

4 years, 4 months

Re: Is logging.subscribe working in /etc/mailman.cfg?

by Mark Sapiro

On 2/19/19 6:39 PM, Alan So wrote: > I just tested it and observe that, > > 1) If the member send the request to list-leave(a)example.com, the user can confirm and the request is then moderated. The held request is also logged as expected and a notification is also sent to the owner or moderator. However, the owner cannot fulfill his/her request like those under "Subscription requests" in Postorius. The owner have to remove the address manually as a workaround. This is now reported at <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/332> -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 3 months

Re: Removing a moderator via the REST API

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/14/24 13:44, Andy Matthews wrote: > > However it doesn't appear that you can remove a person as moderator via the API, per a comment made by Mark on 8/12/24 in this thread: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… I'm not sure what I said there to make you think that, but first you have to be able to do this via the API because Postorius does it via mailmanclient which uses the API. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailmanclient/-/blob/master/src/mailmanclient/re… -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

7 months, 1 week

Re: Upgrading other python packages than the mailman ones in a venv results in dependency conflicts

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/16/24 03:03, Andreas Vetter wrote: > > OK. So what about --upgrade-strategy eager: > > pip install -U --upgrade-strategy eager mailman postorius django-mailman3 > hyperkitty mailman-web > > Is that allowed/supported? Yes it is recommended if you want to upgrade dependencies and if you have a recent version of pip. Older versions of pip don't support that option but their default behavior is the same as newer versions with --upgrade-strategy eager. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 months

Hyperkitty - not sending from GUI & reply-thread

by sunil soprey

With latest release (HK 1.3.1), does anyone have an issue with no emails from reply-thread? I able to send/receive emails to/from mailman. I see MTA delivered emails, just no emails from HK GUI. No errors logs (py exception) nor mailman. ideaS? Versions: mailman-hyperkitty (1.1.0) - Mailman archiver plugin for HyperKitty INSTALLED: 1.1.0 (latest) HyperKitty (1.3.1) - A web interface to access GNU Mailman v3 archives INSTALLED: 1.3.1 (latest) mailman (3.3.0) - Mailman -- the GNU mailing list manager INSTALLED: 3.3.0 (latest) postorius (1.3.1) - A web user interface for GNU Mailman INSTALLED: 1.3.1 (latest) django-mailman3 (1.3.1) - Django library to help interaction with Mailman INSTALLED: 1.3.1 (latest) mailmanclient (3.3.0) - mailmanclient -- Python bindings for Mailman REST API INSTALLED: 3.3.0 (latest) f

5 years, 5 months

Re: Mailing list name with capital letters?

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/26/23 12:00, Mark London wrote: > I guess this is not possible? If you mean create a list with upper case in it's list_id or list posting address, you are correct, but since in your OP you said "Right now, only the first letter can be capitalized." you must be talking about the list's display name. That can be set in Postorius at Settings -> List Identity per my reply at <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…>. It can also be set via REST or mailman shell. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

1 year, 8 months

Re: General question mailman3: message sender acceptance "always"

by Wikinaut

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/23/23 05:41, Wikinaut wrote: > > I could not find such an option (in the moderation dialog) in Mailman3 (only "accept" or "reject" and "discard", but "accept and add to white-list = accept always"). > > In the Postorius held messages view, click on the message's subject to > open a dialog showing the messages content Dear Mark, sorry: How should I know this? I'd rather prefer to have these both changes: i) relabel the existing one od three buttons from "accept" to "accept once" ; and ii) add a fourth button "accept all messages from this sender (i.e. add to white list)"

1 year, 7 months

Re: Adding a domsin

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/13/20 1:33 PM, Allan Hansen wrote: > > It’s mostly working but the Postorius page and the ‘noreply’ emails still sport the old domain name. I hav looked at all the py and cfg files where the old name appeared, and they no longer hold the old name. My coadmin now tells me that the database has a table with the old name. Any suggestion as to whether that can cause the issue and if it’s safe to change the table. Look in Mailman's var/templates/directory. I suspect you have a site/en/ subdirectory with templates containing the old name. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 5 months

Re: Language Support In Templates

by Mark Sapiro

Mark Sapiro wrote: > > This is a bug in Postorius. I just reported it at > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/465. I have deleted that bug report as it appears the language attribute in the postorius_emailtemplate table is unused anyway. Notices built from templates are sent by core in the appropriate charset, that of the list's preferred language for admin notices and the either the user's or the list's preferred language for user notices. (Un)sibscribe confirmations are sent in the list's preferred language. In Brian's case the (default) charset for Greek is UTF-8, so if the template was encoded as UTF-8 and the list's preferred language was Greek, it should not have been garbled.

4 years, 4 months

Re: Ann: Mailman Core 3.3.5 is out

by Brett Delmage

On Wed, 29 Sep 2021, Eggert Ehmke via Mailman-users wrote: > Should I upgrade my Mailman 3.3.3 installed from Debian Bullseye? I would have > to bypass the Debian installer. Or will there be Debian packages available? > Same question for Postorius 1.3.6 I am excited to see 3.3.5 with its many updates available. Thanks to all the contributors. I would like to know this too, as I was just about to install parallel to the Debian package(s). I expect there are many of us. Going forward, what is the best way to maintain a stable version of 3.3.5 with security and defect fixes only, exluding new features? Is picking and applying individual checkins on gitlab the only way? Brett

3 years, 8 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"