Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Postorius no connection to REST API

by Abhilash Raj

Apologies for the top-post in advance. So, I am still catching up to this and I don’t very well understand apache2 config, so I’ll try to briefly describe what the setup should be and perhaps it can be translated into apache2 config. Since this thread is mostly about Web stuff, I am not going to talk about mail setup, but replacing `web server` with `mta` and appropriate port changes are the only major differences in mail setup. Postorius (using Django library/web framework) speaks WSGI and can be run using a WSGI Server. There are multiple options for choosing a WSGI server like uwsgi, gunicorn etc. There are also some common web server plugins like mod_wsgi, which are essentially WSGI servers implemented as Apache2 plugin. Web server reverse proxies the WSGI server which runs Postorius/Hyperkitty. You want WSGI Server to be configured to listen on either a socket or a port and then also configure web server to reverse proxy the socket or port. *Ideally* you want to terminate TLS/SSL at the web server level and proxy the HTTP request to the local WSGI server. You don’t need to do anything special for Mailman for SSL if you do this, just follow the regular Web server documentation for SSL for any domains you are supporting in Mailman. If you don’t want to terminate TLS at web server and instead want it down to the last step, WSGI server itself, then the setup is something we don’t have any docs for at the moment but if you go to the respective WSGI server’s docs, I think you’ll find some. uwsgi is a WSGI server implementation, but it is a lot more than that, resulting in a bit more complicated configuration and issues, even though it is stable. The documentation for it exists, but it can be hard to parse if you don’t know a lot about WSGI stuff. A few notable things about uWSGI that Mailman documentation uses are, (1) Ability to manage a daemon process like systemd and (2) ability to speak a new custom protocol called uWSGI with Web Server instead of HTTP that most other WSGI servers use to talk to Web Servers. (1): This is specified as a part of the the “attach-daemon” configuration in the uwsgi.ini file. For Mailman, we use # Setup the django_q related worker processes. attach-daemon = /opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman-web qcluster Which will essentially start `mailman-web qcluster` command which starts and a daemon and manage that daemon. Putting it in the uWSGI makes it easy to manage the lifecycle of this and the WSGI server together. If you were using something else like gunicorn, this would be a separate systemd service which you’d start/stop along with mailman-web. (2): This is *probably* what is causing the issue for you from what I can gather in this thread, but I am not sure. Web Server <—> uWSGI communication can be either HTTP or (named exactly same as the package name itself, which causes confusion I suppose) uWSGI protocol. Depending on how you configure uWSGI, you want to update your web server configuration to talk the same protocol. ``` uwsgi-socket = /run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock or uwsgi-socket = 0.0.0.0:8000 ``` is the config to talk uwsgi protocol and you want to configure Web server to Proxy using the same protocol. You can find that in the uwsgi docs here: https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Apache.html You probably need an apache module to speak uwsgi, the docs should have the details. Notice the URL is uwsgi:// instead of http://. Other way is to configure uWSGI to speak HTTP, which can be done by replacing "uwsgi-socket" by "http-socket” in the uwsgi.ini configuration. This might be the easiest for you to try, do make sure to restart the mailman-web service after making the change in uwsgi.ini. Abhilash > On Aug 16, 2021, at 9:34 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen.fw(a)u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > > Richard, > > Thanks for the details and the pointer to the full configs. That > makes it possible to take a look, but I can't spend much time on it > until next week. > > I'll see if I can prod Abhilash who is more expert than I on all this > stuff (I just use mod_wsgi), but there's some more urgent (sorry, but > it's security) stuff going on, and his absence speaks for his $DAYJOB, > I guess. > > Richard Rosner writes: >> That is entirely possible @Stephen. You can see the entire apache config a few posts back plus the additions from @Mark and mine from the last post. As I interpret it, apache is reverse proxying to the uwsgi app, now through http instead of the socket. But I have no idea if that's the right way round. I'm not sure is the config file templates for apache, nginx and uwsgi that you get with the Debian packages are added by the Debian team or if they are there any way and just have been modified to the Debian file layout, but I'd guess either way it's not that likely that they wrote it the wrong way around. But I'm not too experienced to be able to translate the nginx config to apache to see if that would result in something different. >> >> Also, while the nginx config is written as a standalone website, the apache config seems to have been written to just create a /mailman3 site under an existing website, while I use it as a standalone site. So it's entirely possible that I missed something when I modified the website from mailman2 to serve mailman3, but then it shouldn't have been able to show the website at the beginning. >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking)

5 years, 2 months

[MM3-users]Re: mailman 2 vs. mailman 3: what happened to multipart/digest?

by John Hein

Here's an '02 reference in git to the some heritage for multipart/digest ========== commit 63d2568fe58333f8ca0b7582f74b43e775c581cd Author: bwarsaw <> Date: Thu Jul 11 22:14:25 2002 +0000 send_i18n_digests(): Let's generate MIME digests the correct way, by wrapping each message inside the multipart/digest in a MIMEMessage instance. We also no longer need to initialize the mimedigest instance's payload to the empty list. Also, when sending the digests, be sure to include isdigest=1 in the metadata, otherwise SMTPDirect will try to tack on another footer. ========== John wrote at 16:46 -0600 on May 12, 2016: > Mark Sapiro wrote at 12:18 -0700 on May 12, 2016: > > On 5/12/16 9:16 AM, John wrote: > > > Digest delivery in mailman 2 encapsulated the individual message/rfc822 messages in a multipart/digest container. This allowed email clients to show the messages in the particular digest in a threaded view. > > > > > > This format vs. plain text digests was a user option in Mailman 2. > > > > > > > It seems like the various digest options that I have tried [1] in mailman 3.1.0 (as implemented for the fedora-users mailing list) no longer encapsulate messages in multipart/digest. > > > > > > The core still supports the same plain text and MIME format digests and > > the same individual subscriber and per-list default formats as did > > Mailman 2. The issue is none of these things are exposed in Postorius. > > > > If you subscribe to digests on this list, you will receive the > > 'encapsulated' MIME format because the lists mime_is_default_digest > > setting is True, but currently that has to be set through the > > bin/mailman shell tool. > > > > > > > Is this intentional? Is it a bug - feature that was lost in translation from 2 to 3? Is there a delivery option I'm missing that will turn that back on? > > Thanks for the info - and Barry's reply as well. I understand that > MIME digests are supported in Mailman 3 - that's what I'm using (and > thanks, Barry, for the info that Summary Digests is the same right > now). My quibble is that the multipart/digest encapsulation level is > gone. > > Barry Warsaw wrote at 15:16 -0400 on May 12, 2016: > > The MIME format of MIME digests should roughly be: > > > > multipart/mixed > > text/plain (the digest heading) > > text/plain (the TOC) > > message/rfc822 > > message-1 > > message/rfc822 > > message-2 > > ... > > text/plain (footer) > > > But mm 2 had: > > multipart/mixed > text/plain (the digest heading) > text/plain (the TOC) > multipart/digest <--- this is the part that's gone in mm3 > message/rfc822 > message-1 > message/rfc822 > message-2 > ... > text/plain (footer) > > So was that removal intentional, a bug or ?? > > Maybe you're saying there is definitely an unexposed (in Postorius) > knob for that in mm3. > > > > > It is the intent that Postorius will eventually expose all these > > settings. We're not there yet. At present you could possibly do this by > > interacting with mailmanclient, although I'm not certain the settings > > are exposed there. You can do it via bin/mailman shell if you have > > access and know what you're doing (see > > <http://mailman.readthedocs.io/en/release-3.0/src/mailman/runners/docs/diges…>) > > > > If you file an issue at > > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/issues/new>, it might help > > expedite this. > > Okay. > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list > mailman-users(a)mailman3.org > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/

10 years, 5 months

Re: Mailman 3 install questions: HAYSTACK_CONNECTIONS

by Odhiambo Washington

On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 6:24 AM <heller(a)deepsoft.com> wrote: > I am using the debian 12 repo versions of mailman3, django, posterious, > hyperkitty, and xapian: > > sharky5% dpkg-query -l > python3-{django,django-mailman3,django-hyperkitty,django-postorius,xapian} > mailman3\* | grep '^ii' > ii mailman3 3.3.8-2~deb12u2 all Mailing list > management system > ii mailman3-doc 3.3.8-2~deb12u2 all Mailing list > management system documentation > ii mailman3-web 0+20200530-2.1 all Django > project integrating Mailman3 Postorius and HyperKitty > ii python3-django 3:3.2.19-1+deb12u1 all High-level > Python web development framework > ii python3-django-hyperkitty 1.3.7-1 all Web user > interface to access GNU Mailman3 archives > ii python3-django-mailman3 1.3.9-1 all Django > library to help interaction with Mailman3 (Python 3 version) > ii python3-django-postorius 1.3.8-3 all Web user > interface to access GNU Mailman3 > ii python3-xapian 1.4.22-1 amd64 Xapian > search engine interface for Python3 > > Before adding the HAYSTACK_CONNECTIONS options, I have this: > > sharky5% sudo mailman-web haystack_info --no-color --skip-checks > Number of handled 1 index(es). > - Model: Email by Index: <hyperkitty.search_indexes.EmailIndex object at > 0x7fd0de1b0470> > > When I add this to /etc/mailman3/maymail_web.py (adapted from the section > titled: > "Setting up Fulltext search (xapian)" on > https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#set-up-xapian > > HAYSTACK_CONNECTIONS = { > > 'default': { > > 'PATH': "/var/lib/mailman3/web/fulltext_index", > > 'ENGINE': 'xapian_backend.XapianEngine' > > }, > > } > > I get: > > File "/usr/lib/python3.11/importlib/__init__.py", line 126, in > import_module > return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1206, in _gcd_import > File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1178, in _find_and_load > File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1142, in > _find_and_load_unlocked > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'xapian_backend' > > So, do I use Xapian or not? Is something missing somewhere? Is this a > documentation bug or something else? > It cannot be a documentation bug since you are NOT using/following the documentation! The message is good enough. Where is your xapian_backend,py?? ``` wash@gw:~$ locate xapian_backend.py /opt/mailman/mm/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xapian_backend.py wash@gw:~$ ``` I hope the above gives you a clue as to where it should be found. However, since you aren't following the documentation I am familiar with, and I am not a Python expert, my end-of-thinking capacity (/etc) is here :-) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

2 years, 4 months

Re: Customizing Postorios web templates

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Stefan Bethke writes: > I understand. Would you be open to some documentation about the > general approach and a few pointers in the right direction? For > people who are not familiar with Django this is not very obvious. Yes, Without seeing your contribution, I think something like what I wrote with a more precise pointer to Django documentation on overriding templates would be optimal. But I would be open to suggestions. > And also, would you accept a change that enables replacing the icon > in the nav bar and (extending/replacing) the footer, by defining a > block each for these places with the current content as the > default? I would have to see the proposed change. As I said before, I am generally opposed to making it easier to replace our branding. Making the footer extensible while preserving our branding would be fine with me, but it seems to me that it would be hard to do that in a way that would satisfy most use cases and be reliably attractive. > My rationale is that I do not want to track changes to > postorius/base.html manually, Yeah, I understand that. Still I'm reluctant to approve it (espcially sight unseen), but I won't veto it, or any of the parts you've mentioned. So I recommend you consult Abhilash Raj <maxking(a)asynchronous.in>, who is the committer most recently active on Postorius as far as I know, specifically base.html. -- GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan

8 months, 2 weeks

mailman changeaddress -h weirdness

by Washington Odhiambo

ENV: Mailman Core Version = GNU Mailman 3.3.11b1 (Tom Sawyer) Mailman Core API Version = 3.1 Mailman Core Python Version = 3.11.2 (main, May 12 2026, 05:17:27) [GCC 12.2.0] A member requested to be subscribed to a list through the normal process (confirm and approve). I approved. Shortly after, I received an email they sent to one of the moderators requesting that their subscribed address be changed from the OLD to the NEW(ly subscribed) one. So I deleted the new address via Postorius. I went to the CLI and dis: ``` (venv) mailman@eu:~$ mailman changeaddress REDACTED(a)gmail.com kevin@ [REDACTED] Usage: mailman changeaddress [OPTIONS] OLD_ADDRESS NEW_ADDRESS Try 'mailman changeaddress -h' for help. Error: Address kevin@[REDACTED already exists; can't change. (venv) mailman@eu:~$ ``` Since I had deleted the newly subscribed member, this surprised me. I checked again and they were not found among members. Then I checked under non-members and found the new address there. I then deleted it again. Back to the CLI, Same error. Then I did: (venv) mailman@eu:~$ mailman findmember kevin@[REDACTED] (venv) mailman@eu:~$ That returned empty. I went into Django Admin US and searched for - and found the address still in there. I deleted it again. Back to the CLI to change the address, same error - the address still exists. I am stumped. Oh, and maybe we should have that changeaddress option in Postorius as well? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

1 month, 4 weeks

Re: users, users and users (was Re: Re: Cannot request password reset: "The e-mail address is not assigned to any user account")

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/28/22 00:41, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > i'm afraid i still do not fully understand which types of "users" there > are. > > > afaics, there are three different types: > - django users > this is what get's listed under > <https://lists.mailman3.org/admin/auth/user/> Correct. > - mailman accounts > this is what is created when you visit > <https://lists.mailman3.org/accounts/signup/> No. That creates a Django user, not a Mailman user. What you think of as a Mailman account is actually a Django account. > - email addresses > this is what is created when i subscribe to a list *without* having > an account. > e.g. via the "Subscribe" button on > <https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/> Mailman core has users and addresses. A user has one or more associated addresses. When you subscribe to a list without having an account in that way, or via email to list-join or list-subscribe or by being mass subscribed by the list admin or by being imported by `mailman import21`, assuming you are previously unknown, this creates a Mailman user with an associated address and subscribes the user or address. Each user has a primary address and zero or more additional linked addresses. The user can be subscribed to a list as a user in which case, delivery if any is to the user's primary address, or can be subscribed as an address. > afaiu, (multiple) "email addresses" can be associated with a single > "mailman account" (but this is strictly optional). Yes, see above. > if an "email address" is first used to subscribe to a list without a > mailman account, and later a mailman account is created with that very > email address, they get automatically associated. > a single "email address" cannot be associated with more than one > "mailman accounts". Based on the above, your "mailman accounts" are actually Django accounts. With that in mind, the above is correct, but there is no real link between Mailman users and Django users. When you are logged in to the web UI you are logged in as a Django user, and Postorius and HyperKitty know that user's email address and can therefore know if it is a list member and know what address to subscribe or unsubscribe as requested. > i think i got this one right (as it seems pretty straightforward). > > what i don't fully grasp yet is the relation between "django users" and > "mailman accounts". As I have said, what you are calling a mailman account is a Django user and not a Mailman user. > intuitively, i would have thought that they are identical. They are, but they are not Mailman core users. > now mark wrote: > > a Django user, which is distinct from a Mailman user. The users you > > added via the web API are Mailman users, but in order to access their > > lists via the web UI they have to `sign up` to create a Django > > account. > > that seems to indicate, that a "django user" is a (strict) superset of a > "mailman account". No. A Django user is the same thing as what you call a mailman account. A Mailman core user is a separate thing entirely. > you (as admin) can create "mailman accounts" via the web API¹, but they > are only expanded to "mailman accounts" if you (as user) go through the > "Sign Up" process. No. An admin can create Mailman users via the Postorius UI. A Django superuser can also create Django users through the Django admin UI. > otoh, if you create an initial "django user" by signing up, you > automatically create a "mailman account". Because they are the same thing. When you go to the Sign-up link on a Postorius or Hyperkitty page you go to https://example.com/accounts/signup/, and that's Django, not Mailman. > so are the two distinct concepts that are just associated via some > common property (e.g. the email address), or is there some intrinsic > relationship between the two (e.g. parent-child inheritance relationship)? They are distinct. Django users have email addresses and Mailman users have email addresses and they can be associated in that way. There is no other link. > so my recent experiment (comparing the output of > <https://lists.example.com/admin/auth/user/> with that of `[u for u in > getUtility(IUserManager).users]`) indicates that they are indeed > distinct objects that *can* be associated with each other. > > could you please clarify this? I hope I have. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

4 years, 9 months

Re: Mailman notify generating emails for request that aren't visible.

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/31/21 6:11 PM, Simon Coggins wrote: > Hi, > > We’re running mailman 3.3.4 (about to upgrade to 3.3.5 this week). I enabled mailman notify cron a few weeks ago to email out any pending requests for admins. I’ve now got multiple lists that keep emailing out the same outstanding holds but they can’t visible in the GUI. The requests are all duplicates as well. This is a redacted example email: > > -----Original Message----- > From: mailman-alerts(a)example.com<mailto:mailman-alerts@example.com> > Sent: Monday, 1 November 2021 8:10 AM > To: somelist-owner(a)lists.example.com<mailto:somelist-owner@lists.example.com> > Subject: The somelist(a)lists.example.com<mailto:somelist@lists.example.com> list has 4 moderation requests waiting. > > The somelist(a)lists.example.com<mailto:somelist@lists.example.com> list has 4 moderation requests waiting. > > Held Unsubscriptions: > User: john.smith(a)maildomain.com<mailto:john.smith@maildomain.com> > User: john.smith(a)maildomain.com<mailto:john.smith@maildomain.com> > User: john.smith(a)maildomain.com<mailto:john.smith@maildomain.com> > User: john.smith(a)maildomain.com<mailto:john.smith@maildomain.com> > > Please attend to this at your earliest convenience. Your lists are configured with Un-Subscription Policy moderate or confirm, then moderate so unsubs require Moderator approval. What Postorius version is this? Prior to 1.3.3, unsubsubscription requests were not visible in Postorius. In 1.3.3_+ they are available in the Subscription requests dropdown at https://example.com/mailman3/lists/listname.example.com/unsubscription_requ… although they may not be counted in the Subscription requests count badge. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years

ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'settings'

by Michela

Hello! I've just set up Mailman 3 with Hyperkitty and Postorius in venv via pip by using the guide at https://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html#virtualenv-inst… on Oracle Linux 8.3 with Python 3.6.8. The process seemed to go smoothly and without errors. The log file, /opt/mailman/web/logs/uwsgi-error.log, contains the following stack trace, however. Note the bit toward the bottom: "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'settings'" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 224, in fetch_command app_name = commands[subcommand] KeyError: 'qcluster' During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman-web", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/mailman_web/manage.py", line 30, in main execute_from_command_line(sys.argv) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 401, in execute_from_command_line utility.execute() File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 395, in execute self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 231, in fetch_command settings.INSTALLED_APPS File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/django/conf/__init__.py", line 76, in __getattr__ self._setup(name) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/django/conf/__init__.py", line 63, in _setup self._wrapped = Settings(settings_module) File "/opt/mailman/venv/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/django/conf/__init__.py", line 142, in __init__ mod = importlib.import_module(self.SETTINGS_MODULE) File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/importlib/__init__.py", line 126, in import_module return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 994, in _gcd_import File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 971, in _find_and_load File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 953, in _find_and_load_unlocked ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'settings' [uwsgi-daemons] throttling "/opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman-web qcluster" for 245 seconds [uwsgi-daemons] respawning "/opt/mailman/venv/bin/mailman-web qcluster" (uid: 1002 gid: 1002) Mailman and mailman-web do start without errors when I run them via their systemd unit files and Postorius serves up pages (without styles and such, which I'll fix later). SELinux is disabled, at least while I work through this issue. I've gone over the configuration files, and everything appears to be in order as written in the installation instructions, but that's likely not the case. :) My configuration files outside of the Mailman virtual environment are in /etc/mailman/: (venv) [mailman@host ~]$ ls /etc/mailman3/ mailman.cfg __pycache__ settings.py uwsgi.ini When searching the web about this, I only found one result, on this very list, but it didn't have quite enough information for me to solve my issue. It might also not quite be the same problem: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… Might you be able to point me in the right direction on solving this issue? Please tell me if there is any more information I can provide to that end. Best, Michela

5 years, 5 months

Re: Archiver "prototype" and disabling archiving at all

by Torge Riedel

Am 28.03.19 um 17:45 schrieb Abhilash Raj: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, at 9:18 AM, Torge Riedel wrote: >> Am 24.03.19 um 16:49 schrieb Mark Sapiro: >>> On 3/24/19 5:40 AM, Torge Riedel wrote: >>>> in the settings of a mailing list I can choose two archivers: >>>> "Hyperkitty" and "prototype". What is this archive "prototype" and how >>>> can I disable/remove/deinstall it? And how can I disable archiving at >>>> all, so no archiver can be chosen in the settings. >>> The prototype archiver stores messages individually in >>> var/archives/prototype/LIST_NAME/. >>> >>> You can disable the prototype archiver by putting >>> >>> [archiver.prototype] >>> enable: no >>> >>> in your mailman.cfg. To disable all archiving, just remove all the >>> [archiver.*] sections from your mailman.cfg or set them to 'enable: no' >>> >>> >> Hi Mark, >> >> thanks. This disabled the archivers, but there is still the "Archives" >> link on top of the page. Is it possible to remove it? Cause there is >> nothing to see there. I tried commenting "'hyperkitty'," in >> INSTALLED_APPS, but then I got a 500. > INSTALLED_APPS = ( > 'postorius', > 'django_mailman3', > # Uncomment the next line to enable the admin: > 'django.contrib.admin', > # Uncomment the next line to enable admin documentation: > # 'django.contrib.admindocs', > 'django.contrib.auth', > 'django.contrib.contenttypes', > 'django.contrib.sessions', > 'django.contrib.sites', > 'django.contrib.messages', > 'django.contrib.staticfiles', > 'django_gravatar', > 'allauth', > 'allauth.account', > 'allauth.socialaccount', > ) > > > This is how it should look like if you want to remove Hyperkitty. There > are a few other settings you should remove. > > https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/blob/master/example_project/settings.py > > This is a Postorius only configuration for reference. > > >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users(a)mailman3.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave(a)mailman3.org >> https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ >> Hi, I gave it a try, but I was not able to disable hyperkitty. I compared the settings in the link you gave and I see a lot of differences. Some of them I am not sure why they are missing in other example settings. Currently I would say, I will keep the archive link there until it is more clear for me how to set things up. Since archiving is disabled, there will be no data in the archive. That is okay for the moment. Regards Torge

7 years, 7 months

Re: Accept these non-members

by Stephen J. Turnbull

Lars Bjørndal writes: > All addresses, both addresses that I know has sent messages to the > list and others, are marked as MemberRole.nonmember> Action.defer Post from these nonmembers go through normal checks (spam, for example) before being distributed. > When I view non-members in postorius, I get some differences: > > Some ar marked: Regular List default, and others Regular Default > processing. "List default" means "this user has not made a choice, so Mailman will check what is 'normal' for the list in the list's configuration". In detail, Postorius is intended to allow users and list administrators to *modify* configurations. At delivery time, these configurations "cascade", typically in this way: - if this subscription has a setting, apply it, and return; if not - if the address this subscription delivers to has a setting, apply it, and return; if not - if the user who owns that address has a setting, apply it, and return; if not - if the list that is subscribed to has a setting, apply it, and return; - otherwise, use the fallback setting from the source code. In Postorius, the "no setting" option is displayed in such a way that the person considering changing the setting knows what the next level of the cascade is. "List default" means "this user has not made a choice, so Mailman will check what is 'normal' for the list in the list's configuration". "Default processing" is a regular option, that can be applied to this post. It means "check if the user is allowed to post at all, then check for reasons (eg, spam) why this post might not be OK". Usually "list normal" is also "Default processing", but it might be "Hold for moderator", for example. On the other hand, Mark's script will return the option that will be applied using the logic of the cascade. > The list is imported from Mm 2.1 a long time ago. I don't know if > that matters. I don't think it does. > Hm, this is a mystery to me. Is there othere places I can search > for addresses that are aloud to send to the list? I don't understand what you want. The "mailman shell interaction" that Mark posted earlier gives you exactly the list of members who can post to the specified list. If some are "trusted users" who don't go through the spam checker, etc, they are displayed with Action.accept. Other posters are displayed with Action.defer. But both will automatically be distributed as long as they appear to be legit posts (not spam, etc). Steve -- GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan

7 months, 4 weeks

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"