Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: Weird startup problem after upgrade

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/2/22 08:21, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I am facing an odd situation in which MM3 doesn't start successfully on > reboot, but I can start it manually. > This is a venv install. > This started after I did an upgrade (pip install --upgrade mailman > postorius hyperkitty mailman-hyperkitty) followed by the requisite > collectstatic|compress|compilemessages|migrate > post-update commands. Was the venv activated when you ran pip? You should also include django-mailman3 and mailmanclient in the packages to be upgraded although they are dependencies and "should" upgrade anyway. Also, at least one person has noted that --force-reinstall was required to get all dependencies upgraded <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message…> > Secondly, it appears that the upgrade did NOT change the versions for the > upgraded components - postorius=1.3.6, hyperkitty=1.3.5, > Mailman Core Version=3.3.5. I was expecting the version to all bump up to > the latest. What does `pip freeze` in the venv show for versions? > Thanks in advance for any insights into what could be causing this. How do you start it manually? `mailman start` or `systemctl start mailman3`? What's the content of /etc/systemd/system/mailman3.service? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 11 months

Re: Extracting mailing list users

by Mark Sapiro

On 1/2/23 07:06, Jan Eden via Mailman-users wrote: > On 2023-01-02 14:36, Eggert Ehmke via Mailman-users wrote: > >> Thank you, that worked! Now all my addresses are clean. >> >> Still, don't you think this should be possible via Postorius, or by some mailman cli command, like >> mailman rename_member <old> <new> Yes, it should be possible to change the display name for an address via Postorius. See https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/451. >> It happened I had still the patched cli_members.py where I had both the old and new line active: >> print(formataddr((address.display_name, address.original_email)), file=outfp) >> print(f'{address.display_name} <{address.original_email}>', file=outfp) >> The first (old) line still produces the output with utf-8 codes. Is this to be expected? > > I would assume the original line outputs the QP-escaped names, to be > used in an email header. Yes. The original `formataddr((address.display_name, address.original_email))` creates the format `display name <email>` suitable for use in an email header. Thus, if the display name contains non-ascii, it is RFC 2047 encoded. The encoding may be quoted-printable or base64 depending on which is shorter. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 10 months

Re: Mailman and Mailman-web databases

by Odhiambo Washington

On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 12:31 PM Andrew Hodgson <andrew(a)hodgson.io> wrote: > Hi. > > Just come out of a bit of a server reorg where I followed the new > instructions to get Mailman3 up and running with Mailman-web. > > Virtualenv Installation - Mailman Suite 3.3 documentation (list.org)< > https://docs.list.org/en/latest/install/virtualenv.html> > > In these instructions we are using 2 databases for the Mailman and Django > components. I guess it doesn't harm anything to have just one database for > both but wondered whether it was a good idea to split eventually? > Nice question. The thing is, Mailman Core doesn't know about the existence of any web interface (Postorius & Hyperkitty). I believe that is the reason why the databases are split in the documentation. Someone can decide NOT to install Postorius and Hyperkitty. If one decides to have everything centrally, then I see no harm in using the same database. I have sites using the same database for both, and others that are split. It's cosmetic, I think. I will let the experts have their say. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]

3 years, 7 months

Assistance with mailman3

by ayen＠afilias.info

Hi all I'm pretty new to mailman but been trying to install mailman 3 and been running into issues, following the documentation at http://docs.mailman3.org/en/latest/prodsetup.html installed Python 3.6, nginx, ruby-sass then with pip installed whoosh mailman-hyperkitty postorius hyperkitty mailman tried to start mailman core, symlinked master and runner -> /usr/bin/ (otherwise it wouldn't run) mailman core starts but when I hit the api url I get this in the logs File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/mailman-3.2.2-py3.6.egg/mailman/database/transaction.py", line 50, in wrapper rtn = function(*args, **kws) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/mailman-3.2.2-py3.6.egg/mailman/rest/wsgiapp.py", line 218, in __call__ return super().__call__(environ, start_response) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/falcon/api.py", line 248, in __call__ responder, params, resource, req.uri_template = self._get_responder(req) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/falcon/api.py", line 664, in _get_responder route = self._router_search(path, req=req) TypeError: find() got an unexpected keyword argument 'req' Mar 13 10:54:44 2019 (17273) 127.0.0.1 - - "GET /3.1/ HTTP/1.1" 500 59 and on frontend "A server error occurred. Please contact the administrator." that leads to my gnu not working and throwing keyerrors for postorius. I'm using a clean install of ubuntu 18.04 but have also tried to install on centos 7 with no success. Are there any missing dependencies or steps that I've missed any assistance would be appreciated. Andy

7 years, 7 months

Re: Message-Footer after migrating to Mailman3

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/24/21 10:43 AM, christopher.claus(a)tgcamberg1848.de wrote: > > I found the file > [code] > /usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/mailman/templates/de/list:member:generic:footer.txt > [/code] > which includes the old footer: > [code] > _______________________________________________ > $display_name Mailingliste -- $listname > Zur Abmeldung von dieser Mailingliste senden Sie eine Nachricht an ${short_listname}-leave@${domain} > [/code] > > but no configuration item to disable this behaviour. That is the default footer template that's part of the Mailman distribution. That template is overridden by those in Mailman's var/templates/ directory. Mailmnan's import21 process created footers template in var/templates/lists/<LIST_ID>/list:member:regular:footer.txt and var/templates/lists/<LIST_ID>/list:member:digest:footer.txt > I created a new template list:member:regular:footer for the list to override the footer. But the old footer is still used where did you put it? > in detail: the resulting message sent to all subcribers of the list contains only the footer and the content sent to the list is an attachement of that "footer-message". This is the basic reason why I want to change it. > > In the logfiles I found an error and a warning: > [code] > ERROR 2021-05-24 16:22:22,895 1648 django.security.DisallowedHost Invalid HTTP_HOST header: 'tgc_mailman_web:8000'. The domain name provided is not valid according to RFC 1034/1035. > WARNING 2021-05-24 16:22:22,896 1648 django.request Bad Request: /postorius/api/templates/list/homepage.gruppe.tgcamberg1848.de/list:member:regular:footer > [/code] It appears you created the new template with Postorius, but there is an issue for Postorius templates. Possibly your Django setting for POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL needs to be adjusted. > Obviously I have a problem with the hostname. I set > [code] > POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL=http://tgc_mailman_web:8000 > [/code] > where tgc_mailman_web is my container name. This URL ist stored in the DB-table "template" for the name=list:member:regular:footer. A call to my fqdn or to localhost > [code] > wget http://localhost:8000/postorius/api/templates/list/homepage.gruppe.tgcamber… > [/code] > will return the footer itself - this works fine. Therefore, should i set POSTORIUS_TEMPLATE_BASE_URL to http://localhost:8000? If that works, yes. > I think, resolving this issue will use the newly configured footer. But I started with the intention to remove alle footers due to the attachement situation described above. > > Does anybody have an idea how to change the configuration of my list? Are these problems probably related to the import? Currently we are using more then 25 lists with a lot of users. Manually recreating all lists is not possible an could only be a test for a single list. The issue you are seeing has only to do with the fact that the footer is non-empty. It is not related to footer content. It is because you are posting other than text/plain messages and the MUAs you are viewing the mail with are confused by the footer being a separate MIME part. See the FAQ article at https://wiki.list.org/x/4030707 for discussion of this issue in MM 2.1 which is also relevant to MM 3. To disable adding footers entirely, sitewide, create an empty file, readable by Mailman at Mailman's ``` var/templates/site/de/list:member:generic:footer.txt ``` More about templates and search rules is at templates/de/list:member:generic:footer.txt and https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/utilities/i18n… -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 5 months

Re: integrating mm3 with postfix / lmtp

by Fabian A. Santiago

On October 25, 2017 9:13:20 PM EDT, Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >On 10/25/2017 05:41 PM, Fabian A. Santiago wrote: >> >> No to the domains part and I think virtual alias maps is needed: >> >> mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[19445]: warning: do not list domain xxx >in BOTH virtual_mailbox_domains and relay_domains >> Oct 25 20:39:19 mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[19445]: warning: do not >list domain xxx in BOTH virtual_mailbox_domains and relay_domains >> Oct 25 20:39:19 mail postfix/submission/smtpd[19441]: NOQUEUE: >reject: RCPT from >pool-108-53-239-102.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net[108.53.239.102]: 550 5.1.1 ><test123@xxx>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual >mailbox table; from=<fsantiago@xxx> to=<test123@xxx> proto=ESMTP >helo=<[10.0.0.29]> > >(above slightly sanitized for return to the list) > >The issue here is your list domain cannot be a virtual_mailbox_domain >or >a virtual_alias_domain. > >I have the same issue on mail.python.org where we have both Mailman 2 >and Mailman 3 lists @python.org. and python.org is a >virtual_alias_domain. > >I have a group of MRs for a branch that implements "alias_domains" to >deal with this. > >Basically it works by creating another (virtual_alias_maps) >postfix_vmap >mapping to map list addresses @python.org to addresses @x.python.org. >Then the postfix_domains and postfix_lmtp maps have the x.python.org >domain and there is a patch to mailman/runners/lmtp.py to map the >x.python.org domain back to python.org. > >The various MRs are ><https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/merge_requests/202> for the core, ><https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailmanclient/merge_requests/18> for the >REST bindings used by Postorius and ><https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/merge_requests/186> to be able to >set an alias_domain via Postorius. > >That's not all implemented at mail.python.org. What's there is the >basic >Postfix config, a bash script the generate the new mappings from the >old >and a simple patch to mailman/runners/lmtp.py. > >So, the bottom line is it can be done and it's in process, but it won't >really be supported until Mailman 3.2. In the mean time, you just need >to have a separate domain for your lists that isn't a virtual_*_domain. Ok thanks. At least I have a clear answer now. Any ETA on 3.2 in mind yet? -- Thanks, Fabian S. OpenPGP: 3C3FA072ACCB7AC5DB0F723455502B0EEB9070FC

9 years

custom css?

by Stephen J. Turnbull

jamie--- via Mailman-users writes: > I've installed the mailman3, mailman3-full, mailman3-web, and > python3-django-mailman3 packages on Debian trixie. Everything is > working - thank you developers! You're welcome. > However, I would like to modify how the web pages look (both > postorius and hyperkitty). I noticed that the web interface on this > server (lists.mailman3.org) looks much nicer than the one showing > on my server. For one, on my installed instance, the left and right > margins are not set, so content is flush with the edge of the > screen. Most likely there's a problem accessing the CSS files for Postorius and/or HyperKitty. > What is the easiest/most maintainable way to add my own css code > and/or files to adjust how the web interface is displayed? Is that > possible? It is possible (I've done it for some simple changes), but this is a Django question. You probably want to ask on the Django lists if you want to do something more extensive than change some of the text in the pages. The easiest way in my experience is to find which of the directories on the path to the CSS mailman-web needs doesn't have at least search (o=x) set for both the 'mailman' user and the webserver user (typically 'www-data' on Debian family OSes), and fix that. Look in the error logs for both mailman-web and the webserver for "couldn't access something.css". That's partly a joke, I would think Debian would get this right. But I've run into that twice on systems for security-paranoid clients. Check it, you don't want to write it from scratch since you do like the default style pretty well. If you get the default styles running, and nevertheless want to do more, Django has search paths for such files that you can add to in 'settings.py'. I recommend adding "/etc/mailman3/whatever" fvo whatever = templates, styles, etc. and putting your substitute files there. Debian won't touch those (except may if you purge the configs?) Of course you'll have to deal with any changes in parent templates, but this is much more maintainable than changing the distribution templates and styles. Steve -- GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan

11 months, 4 weeks

Re: Is it possible to add non-members in regex format in Mailman 3 ?

by Mark Sapiro

On 6/16/20 7:09 AM, Shashikanth Komandoor wrote: > > But in mailman 3, I am not allowed to add the non members in > the regex format. Of course it is allowing me to add individual mail ids > and give permissions. But I want to add a non-member which may be something > like the entire cisco.com domain on which I want to set the rule. You cannot add a non-member with a regexp email, but the legacy *_these_nonmembers list attributes still exist in Mailman core and accept regexps. These settings are exposed in Postorius 1.3.3+ under Settings -> Message Acceptance. With older Postorius, you ned to set these directly in core, e.g. with `mailman shell` as in $ bin/mailman shell -l list.example.com Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell Use commit() to commit changes. Use abort() to discard changes since the last commit. Exit with ctrl+D does an implicit commit() but exit() does not. The variable 'm' is the list.example.com mailing list >>> m.accept_these_nonmembers [] >>> m.accept_these_nonmembers = ['^.*[.(a)]good\.domain$'] >>> m.accept_these_nonmembers ['^.*[.(a)]good\\.domain$'] >>> -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 4 months

Re: Starting new thread in Postorius -> disappears

by Mark Sapiro

On 11/29/2017 05:05 PM, Cameron Smith wrote: > > On November 21, I sent the message below, as a part of this very thread, to Thor and cc’d the mailman 3 list. But the message never showed up in HyperKitty [1]. I don’t know if other list members received it in their email inboxes or not. Your post was received: Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/cleanup[15735]: 2B3798008D: message-id=<836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/qmgr[20545]: 2B3798008D: from=<ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>, size=10048, nrcpt=1 (queue active) delivered to Mailman core: Nov 21 14:31:20 mailman postfix/lmtp[15737]: 2B3798008D: to=<mailman-users(a)mailman3.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:8024, delay=0.31, delays=0.28/0/0/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok) and immediately discarded: Nov 21 14:31:21 2017 (19106) DISCARD: <836BFAB0-4879-4EDF-9026-FEC17D4A2BEC(a)mail2.cetsi.com> > Thor obviously received the message (it was addressed to him directly), because he referenced it in a message that is in the archives [1]. However, I never received an email copy of his message from the list. Possibly you never received a list copy of his message because you were directly addressed and your list option "Receive list copies (possible duplicates)" is set to No. > So, what’s going on? As to why your post was discarded, unfortunately, the logs don't give more info. There are a couple of possibilities. If your post contained an attachment with Content=Type: application/subtype where sub-type doesn't contain 'signature' it would have been discarded by a header filter rule. Also it looks like you sent the message From: <ccsmith(a)mail2.cetsi.com>. If that is not an address on your <ccsmith(a)cetsi.com> account, it would have been discarded as a non-member post. > What baffles me is that more people are not complaining about this. Is it just that no one has noticed? Or is it some subtle misconfiguration in my system? And in Thor’s apparently. And maybe in the lists.mailman3.org system as well. I see nothing so far to indicate anything at lists.mailman3.org is broken in this respect. The only "unusual" thing is this is now a new thread <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/…>, but presumably that is because your post was in reply to your earlier post which wasn't archived. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

8 years, 11 months

Re: Whitelist non subscriber

by Stephan Krinetzki

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 08/06/2018 06:43 AM, Stephan Krinetzki wrote: > > > The steps are as follows, right? > > - Add users to the list and give the role "nonmember" > > - Set moderation action ('defer' or 'accept') > > Right. Good. So i understand it :) > > > > The only thing missing in the documentation is a note on how to do > > this via the Admin API. Who can explain that to me? > > Can you be more specific about what you are looking for? If by "Admin > API" you mean the REST API, are you asking how to interact with it or > what specific POST/PUT/PATCH commands to send? > > Or are you asking about the 'mailman shell' command? > With Admin API I mean the REST API from the localhost. Whether it's the REST API, the Mailman shell or the Admin API, I personally don't care. The only important thing is that we can set and use this role. However, I think that's settled anyway, since you're writing > > Also, we want to expose the nonmember role in Postorius and enable > setting moderation action for nonmembers, but we didn't get that in MM > 3.2/Postorius 1.2. So the whitelistening is not working at the moment, right?

8 years, 2 months

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"