Search results for "Postorius" - Mailman-users

Re: content filtering in version 3.1

by Mark Sapiro

On 12/12/19 6:36 AM, Dieter Leupold via Mailman-users wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to MM3. I installed version 3.1.1 on Ubuntu 18.04. All looks > fine. But i miss the setting "pass_mime_types" at content filtering. The settings are there in Mailman core but not exposed in Postorius. You can set them via `mailman shell`. MM 2.1 settings map to MM 3 as: filter_mime_types -> filter_types pass_mime_types -> pass_types filter_filename_extensions -> filter_extensions pass_filename_extensions -> pass_extensions collapse_alternatives -> collapse_alternatives * convert_html_to_plaintext -> convert_html_to_plaintext * filter_action -> filter_action * in Postorius Settings -> Alter Messages The mailman import21 command will properly import these settings when importing a Mailman 2.1 list. > Also i don't find the settings for bounce processing. Are these features > no longer supported at version 3.1.1? Bounce processing is not yet implemented in MM 2.1. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/343>. There was a recent GSOC project to address this. See <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/merge_requests/538>. I don't know how close this is to being ready. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 11 months

Re: templates

by Mark Sapiro

On 5/4/23 11:15, Christian via Mailman-users wrote: > In March when I started troubleshooting my lists, you stated: > > "Also, one other thing you might check. Do these non-working lists have > templates defined in postorius, in particular, one for > list:member:regular:footer, and if not, are there any in Mailman's > var/templates/lists/redlatinleg(a)lists.ccalternatives.org/ derectory that > Mailman doesn't have permission to find and read?" > > There are no other templates listed in either Postorius nor in Mailman's > var/templates (as I stated, I do not even lave a 'lists' subdirectory under > Mailman's var/templates). My subscribers are not receiving message > distributions from my lists, even while some of them are listed in the > archives. See the original thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… (which you hijacked about 4 messages in) and particularly the message at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message… Without further information, I can't say more than that. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

3 years, 6 months

Re: Maximum number of recipients Setting

by Brian Carpenter

On 4/3/21 5:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 4/3/21 1:45 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote: >> I have run several tests. It looks like on the 'Maximum number of >> recipients' setting, a 2 means 1. If I set it to 2, I can have the >> listname(a)listdomain.com only. If I have a CC, it comes to me for >> moderation. If I set it to a 3, I can send out to >> listname(a)listdomain.com plus a CC. If I set it to 3 and add 2 CC's plus >> the listname(a)listdomain.com address, it comes to me for moderation. > > I understand it's confusing, but it's been that way since the beginning > of Mailman 2.1. The docs at > <https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/rules/docs…> > say "For backward compatibility, the message must have fewer than the > maximum number of explicit recipients." > > I agree the description in Postorius could be clarified see > <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/515>. > That explains it. Thanks for solving this mystery. -- Brian Carpenter Harmonylists.com Emwd.com

5 years, 7 months

Re: Mailman 3 localization

by Simon Hanna

> Thanks for the reply, Simon! We were thinking of using plain .po-files > too, however, we couldn't find the matching "src" folder in our > installation, do you have any more details where it or the .po-files > may also be located? What component are you talking about? For Postorius and Hyperkitty you should be able to create the files needed according to this https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/topics/i18n/translation/#message-files First run "django-admin makemessages -l de" to create the .po files and after editing "django-admin compilemessages -l de" to compile them. You should be fine doing that in your production django-project. Otherwise you can clone the frontend projects and run the commands inside the project folders. (src/postorius or hyperkitty/). I know the second option works, since that's what I'm doing (I'm deploying from the git heads) but doing that in the production projects (where manage.py is located) should generate the same files. It might generate files for dependencies as well... As for core, I only know how to translate the templates. I have no idea how the messages included in the source code should be translated.

8 years, 4 months

Re: Various patches for mm3 stable 3.3.1

by Mark Sapiro

On 9/30/20 6:57 AM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote: > > 1. If I do not set up 'individual' or 'full' personalisation, all is > well and the default footer templates are expanded as expected. However > setting up personalisation causes template expansion to fail > completely, and messages get sent with a blank expansion. Your mailman-debug.patch makes changes to mailman/handlers/decorate.py including wrapping all the relevant code in a try:/except: that logs any exception. If you set the level for logging.error to debug, what do you get in the log? This issue doesn't occur in the unpatched code on my servers - personalized footers work fine - so I think the problem must be something in your patch. > 2. I would find the postorius UI much easier to cope with if the > default template was 'populated' into the UI wherever it was non-blank, > rather than the UI starting off as if no templates were defined at all. This is <https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/-/issues/366>. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 years, 1 month

Re: mailman3 postorius cannot retrieve template

by Mark Dadgar

On Nov 4, 2021, at 3:05 PM, Andreas Barth <aba(a)ayous.org> wrote: > * Quanah Gibson-Mount (quanah(a)symas.com) [211104 22:59]: >> >> >> --On Thursday, November 4, 2021 8:25 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro >> <mark(a)msapiro.net> wrote: >> >>> On 11/4/21 5:04 AM, Wolfgang Bock via Mailman-users wrote: >>>> >>>> My conclusion: >>>> I ask you to consider these experiences in an update for the mailman3 >>>> packages in debian bullseye. It would save time, questions and nerves. >>> >>> >>> Issues with Debian packaging should be directed to Debian. >> >> Or as previously discussed, the debian packages should be avoided entirely. > > I strongly disagree with that statement. > > Distribution packages have their own up- and downsides. Of course, how > they are done is to be discussed with the distribution, so: if > something is wrong with a debian package, please follow the > instructions on bugs.debian.org on reporting bugs. > > However, they have the advantage that they're integrated with the > distribution. They have the disadvantage that they're stable for some > time - that is why it's called a stable release. If they have all the > features someone wants, they usually work fine (and my first > mm3-installation was the default debian package). If one looks for > bleeding edge, of course that's not what one can expect from a > distribution package - but that's also a feature. You left out the fact that the distro edition of mailman3 has very poor support because Debian doesn’t know how to do it and the setup is different enough from vanilla that this community has a hard time supporting it as well. You can certainly try to run it, but I’m willing to bet that you’ll regret it. Having tried it myself, I can’t in good conscience recommend it to anyone. The bottom line is that, IMHO, distro works great for fairly mature projects. MM3 isn’t that yet. YMMV, my $0.02, you get what you pay for, etc. - Mark ----- mark(a)pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878

5 years

Re: Moderate mails from owner

by Henrik Rasmussen

Mark Sapiro wrote: > This can happen in a few ways., If this list was originally imported > from Mailman 2.1 by the 'mailman import21' command, there may be a > legacy accept_these_nonmembers attribute for the list. If so, and if a This makes sense. The list was in fact imported from Mailman 2.1. > You need to check the list's accept_these_nonmembers attribute and the > non-member address's moderation action. > > If you have recent Postorius, you can see nonmembers and their options > from the 'users' -> Non-members view. I currently have Postorius 1.2.2 so I don't have it yet. > mailman shell -l list.example.com The sender is in the list of accept_these_nonmembers, however the command memb.moderation_action = m.default_nonmember_action doesn't seem to remove it from accept_these_nonmembers. bash-4.3# mailman shell -l [LISTNAME].lists.example.com Welcome to the GNU Mailman shell The variable 'm' is the [LISTNAME].lists.example.com mailing list >>> m.accept_these_nonmembers ['listadmin(a)senderdep.example.com'] >>> memb = m.nonmembers.get_member('listadmin(a)senderdep.example.com') >>> memb.moderation_action <Action.accept: 3> >>> memb.moderation_action = m.default_nonmember_action >>> m.accept_these_nonmembers ['listadmin(a)senderdep.example.com'] -- Henrik

7 years, 6 months

Re: Struggle on upgrading mailman3-web to new version - Not Found: /mailman//

by Mark Sapiro

On 10/25/21 1:45 AM, Stefan Bauer wrote: > Dear Users, > > I recently upraded mailman3 from Ubuntu 18 to 20. After accessing the > web-interface via > > https://my.mailinglistserver.local/mailman3/postorius/lists/ > > I receive > > Not Found: /mailman//postorius/lists/ > [pid: 1346851|app: 0|req: 4/4] 10.254.253.12 () {70 vars in 1369 bytes} > [Mon Oct 25 10:39:59 2021] GET /mailman3/postorius/lists/ => generated 2821 > bytes in 12 msecs (HTTP/1.1 404) 5 headers in 155 bytes (1 switches on core > 1) > > Where does the wrong path come from (mailman vs. mailman3) See the thread at https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/thread/… ... > <IfModule mod_proxy_uwsgi.c> > ProxyPass /mailman3/favicon.ico ! > ProxyPass /mailman3/static ! > ProxyPass /mailman3 unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost/ > </IfModule> Others have found that removing the trailing slash from ProxyPass /mailman3 unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost/ to make it ProxyPass /mailman3 unix:/run/mailman3-web/uwsgi.sock|uwsgi://localhost fixes the issue. -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years

Re: Problem with redirection when entering alias without a / at the end

by Mark Sapiro

On 3/19/21 2:55 PM, Jens Günther wrote: > > When I want to get to Mailman Starting Page now I need to Enter the > following URL: https://mailman.xyz.de/mailman3/ to be directly > redirected as expected to > https://mailman.xyz.de/mailman3/postorius/lists/ -> works. > > Problem: When leave out the slash at the end and I ONLY enter the > following URL: https://mailman.xyz.de/mailman3 -> then I'm wrongly > redirected to a page, taht does not exist: > https://mailman.xyz.de/mailman/postorius/lists/ -> 404 Huh? that is the same URL as the one above that you say works. Do you mean https://mailman.xyz.de/mailman/postorius/lists without the slash or what. > Where can I change this misbehaviour? In Apache-conf everything seems as > it'S in the docs, for the vHost I do not have any other custom settings. What is the exact content of your RedirectMatch or ReweriteRule or whatebver you are using? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

5 years, 7 months

Re: How to configure an announce-only list?

by Mark Sapiro

On 4/28/26 5:17 PM, Craig Leres via Mailman-users wrote: > I want to create a mailing list that is used for announcements only. I'd > like attempts to post to be rejected with a notification. > > I was able to set the list pw and verify it works with the Approved > header using this reference: > > > https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/rules/ > docs/approved.html > > I find that if both: > > Default action to take when a member posts to the list > Default action to take when a non-member posts to the list > > are set to "reject (with notification)", the approved header is ignored > and messages are always rejected (posted via "mailman inject") This should not be the case. The message is checked for an Approved: header prior to the member/nonmember checks. > Would it be bad to test the approved header before rejecting a message? > Essentially always accept a message with a valid approved header? Is > there another way for me to achieve this? That's the way it should be working. There is a potential issue if the password in the Approved: header when encrypted doesn't match the encrypted value in the lists moderator_password attribute, it is treated as if there were no Approved: header. This is a bug <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/work_items/1276>. I.e., the message should be rejected but with a reason indicating the password was wrong. > On another front, I'm unable to have messages posted via "mailman > inject" use postorius created list templates. Would it be difficult to > add this functionality? That should not be the case. Are you saying messages posted via email use Postorius created templates, but messages posted via mailman inject do not? If the templates are used for messages posted via email, they should also me used for messages posted via mailman inject. Have you verified that the templates are used for messages posted via email? -- Mark Sapiro <mark(a)msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

6 months, 2 weeks

Mailman-users search results for query "Postorius"