Messages hold for moderation - compared to mailman2 it appears that there are fewer options: missing option(?)
Hello, I miss sadly the option of
both:
i) discarding the current message of a sender (not member of a closed list) ; and in the same action ii) adding this person to the whitelist, i.e. accept further mails from this sender.
How can this be achieved?
On 3/7/24 9:35 AM, Wikinaut wrote:
Hello, I miss sadly the option of
both:
i) discarding the current message of a sender (not member of a closed list) ; and in the same action ii) adding this person to the whitelist, i.e. accept further mails from this sender.
When you go to the held messages view in the web UI and click the
Subject: of the held message, there is a dropdown to set the sender's
moderation action. you can select default processing to accept subject
to additional checks or accept to accept unconditionally, subsequent
posts from that sender before clicking the discard or other button.
This works for non-members as well as for members.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Is there a possibility to
- to discard the present mail ; and
- accept this sender (non-member) for further mails ?
The reason:
- Member has sent from their office mail (= not yet known address) - mail 1 on hold and
- sent successfully mail 2 (copy of mail 1) from the known address
So I want to discard the mail #1 (because the copy mail #2 was sent already) but I want to add his office address as member or to the whitelist.
Can this be done in one step? It would be nice, at least.
Just for verification of the previous mail: Mark pointed out exactly how it's done:
-> When you go to the held messages view in the web UI and click the
Subject: of the held message, there is a dropdown to set the sender's
moderation action.
-> you can select default processing to accept subject to additional
checks or accept to accept unconditionally, subsequent posts from that
sender before clicking the discard or other button.
-> This works for non-members as well as for members.
Am 08.03.24 um 20:29 schrieb Wikinaut:
Is there a possibility to
- to discard the present mail ; and
- accept this sender (non-member) for further mails ?
The reason:
- Member has sent from their office mail (= not yet known address) - mail 1 on hold and
- sent successfully mail 2 (copy of mail 1) from the known address
So I want to discard the mail #1 (because the copy mail #2 was sent already) but I want to add his office address as member or to the whitelist.
Can this be done in one step? It would be nice, at least.
Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message/...
This message sent to jens.guenther@posteo.de
On 3/8/24 11:29 AM, Wikinaut wrote:
Is there a possibility to
- to discard the present mail ; and
- accept this sender (non-member) for further mails ?
The reason:
- Member has sent from their office mail (= not yet known address) - mail 1 on hold and
- sent successfully mail 2 (copy of mail 1) from the known address
So I want to discard the mail #1 (because the copy mail #2 was sent already) but I want to add his office address as member or to the whitelist.
Can this be done in one step? It would be nice, at least.
This was answered in the message to which you replied, found at <https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-users@mailman3.org/message/...>.
To reiterate, go to the held messages view. Click the subject of the
message, pull down the --- Set member moderation --- dropdown and
select Default processing or if you really want to bypass additional
checks, Accept immediately (bypass other rules), and click the
Discard button.
It doesn't matter that the address wasn't known beforehand. The post itself created a non-member record for the sender, and the above will set that non-member's moderation action.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
participants (3)
-
Jens Günther -
Mark Sapiro -
Wikinaut