On Nov 10, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> wrote:
The downside to this is that you lose automated bounce processing, of course.
You don't lose bounce processing. It just becomes a bit less reliable. The VERPed envelope sender says exactly what address the message was sent to. Without this information, Mailman (actually flufl.bounce <https://fluflbounce.readthedocs.io/en/latest/README.html>) has to parse the returned bounce message to determine the bouncing address. There are many MTAs that do not send RFC 1894 compliant DSNs and we have several heuristic recognizers to try to parse these, but they can fail.
Brian specified:
verp_personalized_deliveries: no
Doesn’t that default back to regular mass delivery, as opposed to individualized VERPed envelopes, which mandates individual deliveries?
- Mark
mark@pdc-racing.net | 408-348-2878