[MM3-users] Re: user mail not accepted

27 Apr 2021


      No. there was no response received by the user a la "results of your email
commands"
message. Simply the original email sent to the list.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 5:25 PM
To: mailman-users@mailman3.org
Subject: [MM3-users] Re: user mail not accepted
On 4/26/21 5:00 PM, Christian Stalberg via Mailman-users wrote:
...
...
From smtp.log
Apr 26 00:17:39 2021 (807) ('127.0.0.1', 38370) Data: b'DATA'
Apr 26 00:17:39 2021 (807) ('127.0.0.1', 38370) Data: b'QUIT'
Apr 26 00:17:39 2021 (807) ('127.0.0.1', 38370) connection lost Apr 26
00:17:39 2021 (807) Connection lost during _handle_client() Apr 26
00:18:11 2021 (809)
<019301d73a31$8e8e54e0$abaafea0$@ncboliviapartners.org> smtp to
ncpoa@lists.ccalternatives.org for 83 recips, completed in
29.13376259803772 seconds Apr 26 00:18:11 2021 (809)
<019301d73a31$8e8e54e0$abaafea0$@ncboliviapartners.org> post to
ncpoa@lists.ccalternatives.org from christian@ncboliviapartners.org,
5811 bytes Apr 26 00:18:11 2021 (809)
<161939626169.810.9530678025639681522@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
smtp to ncpoa@lists.ccalternatives.org for 1 recips, completed in
0.0420069694519043 seconds
Apr 26 00:18:11 2021 (809)
<161939626169.810.9530678025639681522@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
post to ncpoa@lists.ccalternatives.org from
ncpoa-bounces@lists.ccalternatives.org, 869 bytes Apr 26 11:52:22 2021
(819)
<161943793957.929.15640398646519288095@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
smtp to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org for 1 recips, completed in
0.22335004806518555 seconds
Apr 26 11:52:22 2021 (819)
<161943793957.929.15640398646519288095@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
post to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org from
ssan-bounces@lists.ccalternatives.org,
765 bytes
Apr 26 11:52:22 2021 (819)
<161943793960.929.13309139087156940549@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
smtp to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org for 2 recips, completed in
0.05862092971801758 seconds
Apr 26 11:52:22 2021 (819)
<161943793960.929.13309139087156940549@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
post to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org from
noreply@lists.ccalternatives.org, 810 bytes Apr 26 11:55:22 2021 (819)
<161943812108.929.10391982256874011271@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
smtp to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org for 1 recips, completed in
0.1459965705871582 seconds
Apr 26 11:55:22 2021 (819)
<161943812108.929.10391982256874011271@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
post to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org from
ssan-confirm+2144530ad102026077911eac6eb574bcbd04be92@lists.ccalternat
ssan-confirm+ives.o
rg, 1526 bytes
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) Available AUTH mechanisms: LOGIN(builtin)
PLAIN(builtin)
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) Peer: ('127.0.0.1', 38556) Apr 26 12:01:30
2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) handling connection Apr 26 12:01:30
2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) Data: b'LHLO
zarathustra.ccalternatives.org'
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) Data: b'MAIL
FROM:<christian@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com>'
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) sender:
christian@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) Data: b'RCPT
TO:<ssan-confirm+2144530ad102026077911eac6eb574bcbd04be92@lists.ccalte
rnativ
es.org>'
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) recip:
ssan-confirm+2144530ad102026077911eac6eb574bcbd04be92@lists.ccalternat
ssan-confirm+ives.o
rg
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) Data: b'DATA'
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) Data: b'QUIT'
It looks like the above 12:01:30 are the relevant entries, and that message
was sent to
ssan-confirm+2144530ad102026077911eac6eb574bcbd04be92@lists.ccalternativ
ssan-confirm+es.org
which is not the list, but the list's -confirm address.
Was the response received by the user a "results of your email commands"
message?
...
Apr 26 12:01:30 2021 (817) ('127.0.0.1', 38556) connection lost Apr 26
12:01:30 2021 (817) Connection lost during _handle_client() Apr 26
12:01:34 2021 (819)
<161943849287.814.5890052642238479423@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
smtp to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org for 2 recips, completed in
0.06680631637573242 seconds
Apr 26 12:01:34 2021 (819)
<161943849287.814.5890052642238479423@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
post to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org from
noreply@lists.ccalternatives.org, 821 bytes Apr 26 12:01:34 2021 (819)
<161943849292.814.6140111398379700592@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
smtp to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org for 1 recips, completed in
0.04269862174987793 seconds
Apr 26 12:01:34 2021 (819)
<161943849292.814.6140111398379700592@zarathustra.ccalternatives.org>
post to ssan@lists.ccalternatives.org from
ssan-request@lists.ccalternatives.org,
1335 bytes
Message sent that only the user receives:
What I wanted to see was not the message sent to the list, but the message
received by the one user from the list.  If you are saying this message is
that, it didn't come from any Mailman list.
...
Return-Path: <christian@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com>
Delivered-To: ces@ecovillage.cc
Received: from box.ecovillage.cc ([127.0.0.1])
by box.ecovillage.cc with LMTP id MDucNBythmCTSwAAMoO61A
for <ces@ecovillage.cc>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:07:56 -0700
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
box.ecovillage.cc
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Report:

-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
signature
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
necessarily
  valid

-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
 author's domain
X-Spam-Score: -1.1
Received: from authenticated-user (box.ecovillage.cc [45.79.28.18])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by box.ecovillage.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EADF3E8CC
for <ssan@lists.naturalintelligence.us>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:07:54
-0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;
d=sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com; s=mail; t=1619438876;
bh=1M7F/uIS0bNG6cWjecy/a9QjskrHVwJHkjWRv+ffpM4=;
h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From;
b=jXOswVZgFeHBB+sjIDqVkNBQqIbfZCj9ZUfpVwl10NQEkGaoxckPHNOKT6x9zIqsW
BZ7iZqqi2mWprVQ8LrK48Lp7gvCQ/ipqspMeLt3t+uljzTtryHmV6uJFEAU3hqM33Y
nQqX6Z8la8Ko40F9Ayb4h4e/MOfPdA4nadgf5hZzt/DzPFZvzUbG3V8lWcHuyJNA2y
SQkhbNubQ6iNEEB0SyBjoOjl3g3LVxjxY+9kMGGmX+1PFfW90CpDDShRmKkkscEWaA
NiV0fX6U5LENBBnc6Q9ImLgXuaLdCqlBRBumJBk+eUUr007rpXXVAPck2NvUzGyM2v
kNNGlT68hGzEg==
From: <christian@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com>
To: <ssan@lists.naturalintelligence.us>
References:
In-Reply-To:
Subject: How US chemical industry lobbying and cash defeated
regulation in Trump era
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:07:37 -0700
Message-ID:
<020501d73a94$cbe17440$63a45cc0$@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0206_01D73A5A.1F831170"
Thread-Index: Adc6h7I/qzBKx1yOT6aPOuipppacoQACatZAAADW1wA=
Content-Language: en-us

How US chemical industry lobbying and cash defeated regulation in
Trump era Industry's congressional allies defeated nearly all PFAS
legislation while the Trump EPA killed, watered down or slowalked new
rules
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/26/us-chemical-compan
ies-lo
bbying-donation-defeated-regulation
--
Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org To unsubscribe send
an email to mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org
https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/