I agree Mark. I can't see the issue but those search rules are clear. I'm glad to know I can "force" it to work with the table records but I would like to figure out the more systemic issue in case it could affect other things. ~Kelly
K. Kelly Close, P. E. Senior Project Manager | Water Rights Engineer | Technology Team Lead Office: 303-455-9589 | Direct: 303-867-7665 Kelly.Close@LREwater.com <http://www.lrewater.com/> LREWATER.COM <http://lrewater.com/> 1221 Auraria Parkway, Denver, CO 80204
***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.*
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 5:14 PM Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> wrote:
On 6/7/20 3:47 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
However, you shouldn't have needed to do that. I only mentioned it in case there was an entry for the name and context with a URI pointing elsewhere. The default if there is no entry is to use Mailman's normal search rules which include templates/lists/<list-id>/en/list:member:regular:footer.txt.
The search rules are documented in the code at < https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/-/blob/master/src/mailman/utilities/i18n....
.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/