[MM3-users] Re: user mail not accepted

My apologies. I did not confirm that what I did already sent you was the message received by the user. The mailing list address is ssan@lists.naturalintelligence.us and it seems as though this became an alias for this single user christian@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com .

What I wanted to see was not the message sent to the list, but the message received by the one user from the list. If you are saying this message is that, it didn't come from any Mailman list.

Return-Path: <christian@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com> Delivered-To: ces@ecovillage.cc Received: from box.ecovillage.cc ([127.0.0.1]) by box.ecovillage.cc with LMTP id MDucNBythmCTSwAAMoO61A for <ces@ecovillage.cc>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:07:56 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on box.ecovillage.cc X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report:

• -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
• 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
• -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
• 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily

•   valid

• -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from

•  author's domain

  X-Spam-Score: -1.1 Received: from authenticated-user (box.ecovillage.cc [45.79.28.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by box.ecovillage.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EADF3E8CC for <ssan@lists.naturalintelligence.us>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:07:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com; s=mail; t=1619438876; bh=1M7F/uIS0bNG6cWjecy/a9QjskrHVwJHkjWRv+ffpM4=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From; b=jXOswVZgFeHBB+sjIDqVkNBQqIbfZCj9ZUfpVwl10NQEkGaoxckPHNOKT6x9zIqsW BZ7iZqqi2mWprVQ8LrK48Lp7gvCQ/ipqspMeLt3t+uljzTtryHmV6uJFEAU3hqM33Y nQqX6Z8la8Ko40F9Ayb4h4e/MOfPdA4nadgf5hZzt/DzPFZvzUbG3V8lWcHuyJNA2y SQkhbNubQ6iNEEB0SyBjoOjl3g3LVxjxY+9kMGGmX+1PFfW90CpDDShRmKkkscEWaA NiV0fX6U5LENBBnc6Q9ImLgXuaLdCqlBRBumJBk+eUUr007rpXXVAPck2NvUzGyM2v kNNGlT68hGzEg== From: <christian@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com> To: <ssan@lists.naturalintelligence.us> References: In-Reply-To: Subject: How US chemical industry lobbying and cash defeated regulation in Trump era Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:07:37 -0700 Message-ID: <020501d73a94$cbe17440$63a45cc0$@sewagesludgeactionnetwork.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0206_01D73A5A.1F831170" Thread-Index: Adc6h7I/qzBKx1yOT6aPOuipppacoQACatZAAADW1wA= Content-Language: en-us

How US chemical industry lobbying and cash defeated regulation in Trump era Industry's congressional allies defeated nearly all PFAS legislation while the Trump EPA killed, watered down or slowalked new rules

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/26/us-chemical-compan ies-lo bbying-donation-defeated-regulation

-----Original Message----- From: Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 5:54 PM To: mailman-users@mailman3.org Subject: [MM3-users] Re: user mail not accepted

On 4/26/21 5:41 PM, Christian Stalberg via Mailman-users wrote:

No. there was no response received by the user a la "results of your email commands" message. Simply the original email sent to the list.

I would still like to see the complete raw message as received by the user. That's the only thing that can tell me how it got to that user and provide clues as to why it didn't go to the other list members.

-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

Mailman-users mailing list -- mailman-users@mailman3.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-leave@mailman3.org https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/