Ron writes:
I've been playing with the voting system on a couple of lists (this one included). There are some weird behaviours I've noticed:
I don't know if there is anybody left who is expert on that.
HyperKitty was developed by Red Hat or Fedora personnel, and has not had much if any further development attention for at least five years since they withdrew support. The voting was a feature they wanted, not something that was demanded by the Mailman community IIRC. As an archiver, HyperKitty just works, and the issues I remember have all concerned messages not making it to the archives, performance, or text indexing.
Am I alone in this, or is the feature so unused that nobody else noticed this?
FWIW, I never paid any attention to the voting feature and I don't know anyone who does. I'm sure there are communities that do. Perhaps someone who does can provide more input. It's a feature we distribute, so we should give it some love, but if we have no expertise, it could take a while.
-- GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan