14 Jul
2022
14 Jul
'22
1:47 p.m.
On 7/14/22 1:40 AM, Bjoern Franke via Mailman-users wrote:
I was wondering about example.com, I thought it would have used the list where the issue appeared or at least SITE_ID or SERVE_FROM_DOMAIN.
My impression was (without looking into the logs) that the mails got classified as spam and rejected because the were sent from example.com.
The message is a fake DSN. It is only ever sent as an attachment to a probe or bounce notification. It is never sent on its own, so it shouldn't result in it's being classified as spam because of its From: or To:
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan