On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:30 PM Peter Adebahr via Mailman-users < mailman-users@mailman3.org> wrote:
Hi *
we are receiving a few PGP-signed posts as a S/MIME attachment. Some final recipients check these, and as mailman3 does not munge them - the original mail is signed, not mailman3's final posts - those get rejected.
Does anyone have a idea how to handle this elegantly?
Are you talking from a MuA's perspective? I am thinking that MuAs would handle these differently. And I also think the PGP signature is useless from a mailing list's perspective, as no one cares about the validation it provides. What happens if you set the following for the list:
Collapse alternatives = Yes Convert html to plaintext = Yes
?
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]